![]() The Moto G has a newer version of this chipset - the Snapdragon 410 - but it still runs Android 5.0.2 perfectly fine. When Android 5.1 does eventually arrive, the M2's quad-core 1.2GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 processor should be more than capable of running the OS smoothly. It's not yet known how long this will take, but it's great to see Sony isn't leaving its lower-end devices behind when it comes to Android Lollipop updates. Sony's even confirmed it's bringing Android 5.1 to the M2 via an OTA update once it's been rolled out for the Xperia Z series. The M2's Android 4.3 operating system also feels rather antiquated when you first take it out of the box, but a couple of system updates will soon see you running Android 4.4.4. Text also has a tendency to look slightly fuzzy when reading articles on the web, but this is less of a problem on sites specifically designed for mobiles. Text and icons are just about crisp enough on the M2, but look closely and you'll soon see the rough jagged edges on curved letters and images. With a pixel density of 229ppi, the sharpness of the M2's display pales in comparison to the Moto G, which has a much higher pixel density of 294ppi. However, the M2's real downfall is its tiny resolution of just 960x540. This will make blacks look quite grey in return, resulting in a rather lacklustre black level reading of 0.47cd/m2. Areas of shadow were particularly gloomy, but you can always remedy by increasing the brightness up to its maximum level of 410.75cd/m2. That said, despite a contrast level of 874:1, there was actually less detail present in our test images on the M2 than its rivals. While it doesn't have any of Sony's X-Reality display options, colours still looked incredibly rich and vibrant and we actually preferred its warmer colour cast to the cooler hues present on both the Moto G. This is a shame, as the M2's 4.8in 960x540 display actually looks relatively decent despite its somewhat mediocre 87.7% coverage of the sRGB colour gamut. Likewise, both the front and rear of the phone are extremely prone to picking up fingerprints, making it perpetually dirty despite our best efforts to keep it clean. Likewise, the M2's bulky chassis is almost the same size as the Moto G despite having a smaller 4.8in display, making it feel oversized for the amount of screen space available. However, until that happens, the 3rd Gen Moto G is still our top budget smartphone to buy, as it's definitely aged a lot better than Sony's Xperia M2.įor instance, while the M2's slim 8.6mm unibody makes it feel extremely solid, its angular design doesn't feel half as appealing in the hand as the smooth rounded corners of the Moto G. As a result, it's likely that Motorola will soon be releasing its 4th Gen Moto G very soon, which will probably replace the 3rd Gen Moto G as our top budget smartphone. After all, even Motorola's excellent 3rd Gen Moto G is now only £110 on PAYG or £130 SIM-free from Carphone Warehouse, and this has a newer (and better) version of Android, as well as a considerably faster processor and a much better camera.Īdmittedly, the 3rd Gen Moto G is also getting on a bit, as this was first released last summer. Only a handful of retailers still have it stock, but with prices starting at around £155 for a new phone (or £70 used from Amazon), this is an awful lot to spend on something so old. The Sony Xperia M2 is more than two years old now, and it's almost gone end of life.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |